翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Water supply and sanitation in Paraguay
・ Water supply and sanitation in Pernambuco
・ Water supply and sanitation in Peru
・ Water supply and sanitation in Portugal
・ Water supply and sanitation in Russia
・ Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda
・ Water supply and sanitation in Saudi Arabia
・ Water supply and sanitation in Scotland
・ Water supply and sanitation in Senegal
・ Water supply and sanitation in Singapore
・ Water supply and sanitation in South Africa
・ Water supply and sanitation in Spain
・ Water supply and sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa
・ Water supply and sanitation in Syria
・ Water supply and sanitation in Taiwan
Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania
・ Water supply and sanitation in the Dominican Republic
・ Water supply and sanitation in the European Union
・ Water supply and sanitation in the Netherlands
・ Water supply and sanitation in the Palestinian territories
・ Water supply and sanitation in the Philippines
・ Water supply and sanitation in the Republic of Ireland
・ Water supply and sanitation in the United Kingdom
・ Water supply and sanitation in the United States
・ Water supply and sanitation in Tunisia
・ Water supply and sanitation in Turkey
・ Water supply and sanitation in Uganda
・ Water supply and sanitation in Uruguay
・ Water supply and sanitation in Venezuela
・ Water supply and sanitation in Vietnam


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania : ウィキペディア英語版
Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania

''This article was written in February 2010 and has only been partially updated since then, most recently in December 2013. Please feel free to further update it.''
Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania is characterised by: decreasing access to improved water sources in the 2000s (especially in urban areas), steady access to some form of sanitation (around 93% since the 1990s), intermittent water supply and generally low quality of service.〔 Many utilities are barely able to cover their operation and maintenance costs through revenues due to low tariffs and poor efficiency. There are significant regional differences and the best performing utilities are Arusha and Tanga.〔Caroline van den Berg, Eileen Burke, Leonard Chacha and Flora Kessy, (Public Expenditure Review of the Water Sector ), September 2009〕
The Government of Tanzania has embarked on a major sector reform process since 2002. An ambitious National Water Sector Development Strategy that promotes integrated water resources management and the development of urban and rural water supply was adopted in 2006. Decentralisation has meant that responsibility for water and sanitation service provision has shifted to local government authorities and is carried out by 20 urban utilities and about 100 district utilities, as well as by Community Owned Water Supply Organisations in rural areas.〔
These reforms have been backed by a significant increase of the budget starting in 2006, when the water sector was included among the priority sectors of the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty MKUKUTA. The Tanzanian water sector remains heavily dependent on external donors: 88% of the available funds are provided by external donor organisations.〔 Results have been mixed. For example, a report by GIZ notes that "despite heavy investments brought in by the World Bank and the European Union, (the utility serving Dar es Salaam) has remained one of the worst performing water entities in Tanzania."〔GIZ:(Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reforms in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia:Challenges and Lessons ), 2008, pp. 8-9〕
== Access ==
Access to water and sanitation remains low in Tanzania. Determining data on access is particularly difficult because different definitions and sources are used, which results in significant discrepancies. According to a report, household surveys regularly return lower rural water supply coverage than estimates by the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (which are collected by district water engineers and urban water and sanitation authorities). For urban areas, survey data are consistently higher because they also include households that are not connected to the formal water supply network and access water from neighbours, protected wells or boreholes.〔
Water supply. Slightly more than half the population of Tanzania is estimated to have access to an improved water source, with stark differences between urban areas (about 79% in 2010) and rural areas (about 44% in 2010).〔 In rural areas, access is defined as meaning that households have to travel less than one kilometre to a protected drinking water source in the dry season. Trends in access to water supply are difficult to discern due to conflicting and unreliable data. However, it seems that access increased during the 1990s, particularly in rural areas, but stagnated during the 2000s. According to data from the Household Budget Surveys 2000/2001 and 2007 access to an improved water source in mainland Tanzania even decreased from 55% in 2000 to 52% in 2007.〔 Using a narrow definition, in 2007 around 34% of households had access to piped water, as opposed to 40% in 2000. However, using a broader definition of access that also includes standpipes and protected springs, there has been a slight increase in the proportion of households reporting a drinking water source within one kilometre.〔(Household Budget Survey 2007 - Mainland Tanzania ), pp.13-16. Link was broken on February 28, 2010. 7 November 2011 - HBS document is still available on website of (Tanzanian National Bureau Of Statistics ) via link to Tanzania National Data Archive (TNDA). This requires a logon which is freely available.〕 Estimates from the Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) show a different trend. They show a slight decline in access from 55% in 1990 to 53% in 2010. According to these figures, access in rural areas stagnated, while in urban areas it decreased from 94% to 79% over the same period. The JMP estimates rely on extrapolations using, among others, data from the Household Budget Survey 2000/2001 and 2007, the Census of 2002 and the Demographic and Health Surveys of 1999, 2005 and 2010.〔〔Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation:(Drinking water and sanitation coverage: country estimates by type of drinking water ), accessed on February 28, 2010〕〔Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation:(United Republic of Tanzania, Water Data ), March 2012, accessed on April 19, 2012〕
Sanitation. National Household Budget Surveys ask respondents about the type of sanitary facility they have. In 2007 93% of Tanzanians responded that they had some form of latrine, but only 3% had a flush toilet. International statistics that monitor the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal for sanitation are based on these numbers, but only after making some important adjustments in an effort to achieve comparability across countries. The Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) defines improved sanitation as excreta disposal systems that are private and that separate human excreta from human contact. Shared latrines or open pit latrines are excluded from this definition. The JMP estimates that only about half the latrines in Tanzania can be considered improved sanitation systems. Based on that definition, access to improved sanitation is much lower than the population with access to any type of latrine. According to the JMP definition, access to improved sanitation was only 10% in 2010, up from 8% in 1990, with an increase in urban areas and a slight decrease in rural areas.〔〔(WHO Statistical Information System - Tanzania ), retrieved Feb 4, 2010〕〔Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation:(United Republic of Tanzania, Sanitation Data ), March 2012, accessed on April 19, 2012〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.